Real Estate – What Tends to make A Property Desirable?

Should you were to ask a group of folks hunting for any new dwelling what tends to make a particular city, town or neighborhood desirable real estate, you’d likely get similar answers from each of the respondents. What do these in-demand places have in popular? Take into account the following:

Downtown Living

The closer a person lives towards the center of town, the greater the cost. An individual who wants to become inside walking distance of where the action is will pay a premium cost for the privilege.

Close to Water

If you wish to reside near a body of water, you’ll need to dig deeper into your wallet. Ocean- or lakefront properties are generally more expensive than these situated further inland. Some individuals consider of this purchase as an investment and count on the worth on the property increasing immediately.

House owners may decide to use their house near the water as a holiday get-away place only. The property may be rented out when the owners will not be using it as a solution to defray the cost of owning and preserving the home.

Golf Course Nearby

When hunting for a new household in the event you see a sign indicating that a golf course is nearby, you realize you will be taking a look at a home in a incredibly desirable neighborhood. There is a thing about being close to a golf course that instantly suggests luxurious living.

Older Property

Older houses that make it onto the list of most desirable real estate had been most likely constructed at the very least a century ago. An individual enthusiastic about among these residences just isn’t only buying the constructing and the land it sits on; they’re also purchasing the sense of history that comes with all the house.

To them, older homes have far more character than their contemporary counterparts. The craftsmanship demonstrated by builders in days gone by is just not a thing that can very easily be duplicated today.

Huge Dwelling

When asked to describe their dream dwelling, men and women tend to speak about a spacious residence with significant, airy rooms featuring high ceilings. We want to keep away from the feeling of becoming cramped or obtaining our furniture jammed into a too-small space.

Close to Amenities

Individuals wish to live close for the conveniences of modern day life. The conveniences that are vital to us vary, based on what stage of life we’re in. Individuals with young families desire to reside close to schools. Based on what activities their youngsters are involved in, they might choose to reside close to a swimming pool, skating rink, soccer field, or a dance studio.

No one desires to drive for a extended distance to get to a buying center, day care center, church or synagogue, medical professional, dentist, dance studio mckinney or veterinarian. These individuals who perform out consistently will choose to live close to a fitness center.

The most desirable real estate locations have these elements in frequent. Every single person who photographs his or her dream home will give much more weight to specific things on this want list. Which ones would be in the prime of yours?

Real-Estate Matters: Seller should have disclosed failing septic system

Q: Would the title company find out if a septic system was put into my home illegally before closing? The owner lied at closing about the original system. He never got a permit or engineering done for it.

Neither the real-estate agent nor my attorney told me the house failed the water inspection, and during the final walk-through I didn’t know to look for a new septic system. Should the title company have caught these things?

A: The title company is responsible for searching the “chain of title” of a particular property to make sure the history of who owned the property through the decades is known.

The title company is there to make sure that, when a buyer closes on the property, the buyer has an assurance that the buyer is the rightful owner.

The other part of what the title company does is disclose all matters that affect the title to the property, such as liens, easements and other restrictions that are on the title to the property.

Septic systems are not matters that affect the title and would not come within the scope of what title companies cover.

The person who should have told you about the septic system was the seller, and if not the seller, then the professional home inspector you hired (or should have hired) to scrutinize the property before you finalized your offer.

Furthermore, in quite a few areas, septic systems are necessary and their existence is common knowledge. If you didn’t know that septic systems were common where you were buying, your home inspector should have known.

At the very least, the question should have been raised ahead of time.

In areas where septic systems are prevalent, many real-estate contracts have a provision that addresses their existence and conditions.

The agent and the lawyer should have made clear that the property failed its water test, but we think you should have been driving that bus.

Furthermore, there are different kinds of water tests. You might have a water test for lead in the water, or you might have well water in the home and the test was for the well water.

And finally, you’d have a test for the septic system, but that usually is not referred to as a water test. You should have asked for the results and made sure you understood the implications. If you mean that the septic system failed the test and the seller knew, or should have known, that the property was on a failing septic system, you may be able to argue that this was a material defect that should have been disclosed to you before the closing.

You should discuss the issue with a litigation attorney who has had experience with your state’s seller-disclosure rules and see what options you have.

Send questions to Real Estate Matters, 361 Park Ave., Suite 200, Glencoe, IL 60022, or contact author Ilyce Glink and lawyer Samuel Tamkin through the website www.think

Real Estate Notes: Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre seeks expansion of educational programs

• Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre Charitable will seek approval from the Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment on plans for a two-story addition to 2900 Liberty Ave., Polish Hill, to expand the theatre’s educational programs. Romaine Fulton wants to use a structure at 6736 Kelly St., Homewood, West, as a restaurant. East End Group LLC wants to construct a three-story single-family structure with garage at 141 45th St., Central Lawrenceville.

Send items to

Aspen real estate market's first half best since 2007

The Aspen-area real estate market surged to its best first half this year since prerecession days.

All real estate transactions in Pitkin County totaled $929.24 million from January through June, according to statistics through April that were compiled by Land Title Guarantee Co. and from the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office for May and June.

The dollar volume includes sales of everything from employee housing to commercial buildings in Aspen’s downtown core.

That tops the first-half performance every year back to 2007, when sales from January through June hit $1.43 billion, according to records kept by Land Title Guarantee Co.

Last year, the Pitkin County real estate market hit $662.80 million during the first half. This year is up 40 percent from that time.

Andrew Ernemann, a real estate agent with Aspen-Snowmass Sotheby’s International Realty, said there is no doubt total dollar volume this year will exceed 2014’s. However, dollar volume is still well behind levels set in the mid-2000s.

“We are seeing prices back at that level — not everywhere,” he said.

The high end of the luxury residential market — homes greater than $10 million — is faring particularly well right now, Ernemann said.

Even back in 2009, when overall activity was low, the luxury market was healthy, he said. The segment retreated a bit in 2013 but bounced back in 2014 and is on track for a stronger year this year.

A report prepared by Ernemann shows there have been eight sales in the Aspen area of homes more expensive than $10 million, and another five sales are pending through June. Last year, there were 17 sales of homes at $10 million or greater.

There are 28 homes listed at prices exceeding $15 million. There are 14 active listings between $12.5 million and $15 million and eight between $10 million and $12.5 million, according to Ernemann’s report.

In addition to exceeding last year’s dollar volume, Ernemann said he believes the number of transactions this year to last will be up, though not by a huge amount.

Carrie Wells, a real estate broker with Coldwell Banker Mason Morse, said price per square foot is exceeding prerecession levels for prime properties. That was a trend that started last year, she said.

Markets segments such as the downtown core, West End and Red Mountain are leading the current surge, as they often did in the past, said Wells, who is a previews properties specialist with Coldwell Banker, meaning she specializes in more expensive homes.

“We’re seeing a continuation of how important location is and the lifestyle of our buyers,” Wells said. Many buyers want to be close to the core. That’s resulted in a lack of inventory in those areas. Lower inventory means higher prices.

Aspen-area single-family homes prices are up 18 percent from last year, she said. The average single-family home price for all areas in and around Aspen is $6.3 million, according to Wells.

The 2015 market also has been strong for speculative builders.

“The developers are back in full form, buying and selling,” Wells said. And with good reason, she noted. “New construction is always attractive.”

The strong sales activity has got advantages and disadvantages. Sellers are getting closer to their asking prices. Single-family homes in Aspen are selling for about 91 percent of listing price, Ernemann said, and Aspen condos are going for about 95 percent of listing price.

On the other hand, the sales surge has gobbled up the inventory. Listings are down by about 50 percent in the Aspen area over the past five years, Ernemann said.

In Aspen, the listing inventory is down 9.4 percent from last year at this time in single-family homes and condominiums, while it’s about the same in Snowmass Village, according to Ernemann’s report.

He said he sees two factors contributing to a “glass ceiling” in the Aspen-area estate market. The drop in oil and gas prices could affect the activity in the market from buyers from Texas and other oil-rich places, he said.

Also, the “widespread buzz” about the strength of the market could drive up sellers’ listing prices, even if not warranted.

Ernemann, like most real estate agents who work extensively with statistics for reports, looks at market segments rather than total dollar volume of all sales. His research shows there are some areas that are performing “great” in terms of transactions and prices. Other areas are experiencing strong performance but not great, he said.

However, sellers are getting bullish, regardless of where their property is located.

“They’re hearing that the market is doing well and they don’t want to leave money on the table,” Ernemann said.

In fact, it’s been an “uneven recovery,” he said. Property in and close to the core is doing well. Condos have soared 20 percent in prices since 2012, he said, while single-family homes in the neighborhoods closest to the core are up 20 to 25 percent over that period.

Wells said she expects the first half trends to continue during the second half. About 60 percent of business is during the summer months, she said, and August is particularly robust. Nothing short of a “global catastrophe” could derail the strong performance this year, she said.

Real Estate & Market Report

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Real Estate & Market Report … The index is at the highest point since prior to the real estate bubble days of 2006 and the trend is expected to continue …

California-Based Real Estate Investor Acquires Historic High-Rise Apartment Building in …

WALNUT CREEK, Calif., July 3, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — Sequoia Equities, Inc. announces the acquisition of One Thousand 8th Avenue Apartments, a 351-unit high-rise, apartment building in Seattle, Washington. The property was developed in 1949 and is comprised of 211,119 rentable square feet in two, 14-story residential buildings. 

Photo –

Logo –

The property is located at the base of the historic First Hill neighborhood adjacent to Seattle’s central business district.  This location offers the ideal mix of walkable convenience to the area’s medical and research hubs while being only minutes from the neighboring downtown core.

Sequoia will break ground on an eight million dollar renovation in July to modernize the building’s apartment interiors and amenities.  Sequoia Equities’ General Partner and Vice-President of Acquisitions, Pat Reilly, explains, “One Thousand 8th Avenue presents an excellent opportunity for our investors to yield a strong return as a result of value-added renovations.  Our plan is to reposition the building through interior and exterior improvements, amenity enhancements, and a full branding overhaul that will pay homage to Seattle’s industrial history while bringing the community into the 21st century.”  Interior improvements will include high-style, low maintenance features like wood-plank style flooring, quartz countertops, and full-height backsplashes.

The apartment community was purchased for $93,000,000 with 78% Freddie Mac financing.  Sequoia Equities will also provide the day-to-day management services for the building.

FROM: Sequoia Equities, Inc., 1777 Botelho Drive Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94596

CONTACT: Lisa Trapp, phone (530) 902-4451


Monterey County real estate sales

The following are recorded home and property sales completed in Monterey County by ZIP code from April 20-24, 2015, according to county records.

CARMEL — 93923

Casanova Street; $1.85 million; Mayall, Pamela Ann to Storkan, Dean

25995 Junipero St.; $1.204 million; Owb Reo Llc to Bufkin, A Tiffany and Bufkin, Richard O

Lincoln Street; $1.061739 million; Gragg, Jerry and Maki Ohy Gragg (Com Prop) to Cj Strand Properties

23900 Fairfield Place; $1.025 million; to Hammer, Gregory B and Connolly, Susan E

San Carlos Street; $3.27 million; Depole, Raymond J Jr and Laura B to Depole Jr, Raymond J and Depole, Laura B


4000 Rio Road, No. 13; $460,000; Kaiser, Jean M Tr to O Neill, Catherine M Tr

35 Via Contenta; $700,000; Doelman, Eva E K Tr to Albanese, Thomas J Tr


11260 Mead St.; $337,000; Ortiz, Roberto Lopez and Del Lopez, Angelina Almanza to Barajas, Carlos and Maria Trinidad Castaneda De

DEL REY OAKS — 93940

1000 Rosita Road; $552,000; Forrest, Evangeline R Tr to Shingleton, Jarrod S Et Al

17 Los Encinos Drive; $538,000; Hestia Vacation Homes Llc to Hallack, Khalil G and Hallack, Julio A and Rosa R

924 Portola Drive; $365,000; Kirby, Alan A and Saundra J to Miller, Robert and Bruno, Michael C

851 Portola Drive; $540,000; Apostrofe-Moreno, Mary Ann to Williams, Kenneth Wayne Tr Et Al


18019 Mcdowell St.; $545,310; Bmc Eg Bungalow Llc to Smith, Paula J and James H

GONZALES — 93926

346 Alta St.; $236,000; City Of Gonzales Succ Agency to Irg Properties

1803 Chablis Way; $380,000; Chaidez, Cesar and Maria to Perez, Gabriel

719 Hereford Drive; $320,000; Perez, Gabriel to Cuevas, Adrian Hernandez and Maria Del Los Angeles

MARINA — 93933

3027 Eddy St.; $429,000; Perez, Delfin A and Melyssa A to Xchange Solutions Inc

422 Reindollar; $306,600; Nationstar Mortgage Llc to Eagle Vista Equities Llc

MONTEREY — 93940

107 Littlefield Road; $926,000; White, James G Tr Estate Of to Dickey, James William III

201 Via Gayuba; $600,000; Meyer, Robert G and Susanne M Rasmussen Trs to Tringali, Salvatore P and Tringali, Christopher P

32 Cramden Drive; $1.251 million; Landon, Kevin G and Landon, Edith A to Shaw, Nancy C

925 Doud Ave.; $975,000; Mc Millan, Michael K to Mohr, Richard A and Rhonda M


1313 Lincoln Ave.; $649,000; Kruse, Rachel and Burleigh, Clifton F Jr to Amelio, Joseph A and Tawny

1326 Funston Ave.; $677,500; Tubbs, John M Sr Tr to Mc Kie, Christopher R and Mc Kie, Caroline Mary Coker


1038 Ocean Road; $965,000; Trutner, Kurt H Tr to Nunez, Virginia Garcia

1470 Cypress Drive; $22.5 million; Hazen, Paul and Cassandra to Lee, Robert Tr

ROYAL OAKS — 95076

17 Cayetano St.; $260,000; Nagai, Samuel S to Valencia, Uriel D and Griselda G

21 Boling Road; $349,000; Lopez, Urania M to Campos, Anthony and Dampos, Rebecca Trs

1120 Pajaro Hills Lane; $900,000; Chin, Rupert S and Rupert S Trs to Urias, Jesus and Gabriela

97 Spring Road; $600,000; Petznick, Kenneth J and Petznick, Sandra L Trs to Butler, Ashley and Butler, Douglas


646 Melrose Drive; $415,000; Rodriguez, Sandra to Santiago, Cody Byron and Erica Maria

104 Rossi St., No. 3; $128,000; Montoto, Albert to Rama, Ranjith Kumar Lineseetha

729 Lemos Ave.; $415,000; Heess, Julie M to Gonzalez, Efrian Jr and Rozina, Curenio


716 Yucatan Way; $360,000; Chung, Jane to Ortiz, Cristobal and Morales, Edith Sanchez

1030 Fairview Ave.; $2.6 million; Patel, Ganpatbhai and Nayanaben Patel Trs to Panchal Llc

1209 Modena St.; $469,900; Reed, Donny R and Fan Chi to Blazek, Kathleen Carter

560 St George Drive; $290,000; Aguilar, Jessica to De Anda, Jose Aguilar

1453 Mustang Court; $90,000; Ramirez, Jesus to Ramirez, Elisa M

1805 Monte Bella Blvd.; $442,619; Jeremiad Property Llc to Pioquinto, Valentin M and Pioquinto, Revelyn Alegre


8 Kent Circle; $617,000; Ramirez, Trinidad A and Carmen R to Gonzalez, Laura and Gonzalez, Bernardo

1679 Siskiyou Drive; $330,000; Hernandez, Rodolfo Rodriguez to Zavala, Jose G and Sanchez, Alicia Caudillo

18565 Swaner Ave.; $365,000; Fletcher Homes Llc to Guerrero, Christopher M and Escobedo, Mary H

134 Sutton Way; $379,000; Kim, In Su and Sung, Sook to Moreno, Eduardo Jr and Magallanes, Maria Adriana

217 Pennsylvania Drive; $395,000; Romero, Lucinda M to Hanson, Angela

218 Columbine Drive; $357,500; Klein, Marcy N Tr to Polanco, Elias and Maria De Jesus

556 Mariposa St.; $330,000; Martinez, Guillermina to Christiana Trust Tr

1480 Linwood Drive; $300,000; to Armstrong, Richard A and Dora E

1630 Bunker Hill Way; $390,000; Delaney, Michael to Silim, Felipeneri and Analyn

388 Calaveras Drive; $305,000; Rathbun, John C Succs-Tr to Ortiz, Rigoberto Serrano and Serrano, Maria D


10131 Meadow View Circle; $872,500; to Sanchez, Herbert Estiu and Mesa, Nathalia

9929 Timothy Path; $520,000; Sandholdt, Peter W and Susan to Montes, Jose A

7665 Sleepy Hollow Lane; $417,000; Scardina, Cynthia A to Crites, Jasmine and Joshua


15490 Weatherock Way; $665,000; Mayne, Renee and Bilinsky, Alan to Green, Jonathan L and Green, Denise B

SEASIDE — 93955

1078 Carson St.; $371,500; Irwin, Michelle to Lal, Ranjeet and Savita D

1616 Vallejo St.; $287,261; Diaz, Andres C and Ramirez, Lorenza to Kovac, Branislav

1940 Waring St.; $465,000; Roberts, Craig S and Hideko to Khudhair, Tiba

SOLEDAD — 93960

1149 San Fernando; $385,000; Valladares, Alma and Ismael to Stewart, Thomas C and Barbara A

174 Goldenrod St.; $301,000; Ouita, Martin Llc to Uribe, Enrique J Ceja and Ceja, Marisela Cortes

606 Asilomar Ave.; $340,000; Cuevas, Adrian H and Topete, Maria to Florez, Angelica F and Carrillo, Lissette

630 Rusconi Drive; $399,900; Alquisada, Denie Legayada to Macyshyn, Meroslaw Myron Jr and Marcella


2 Harris Road; $500,000; to Pacific Ag Rentals Llc

Read or Share this story:

The Promising Future of Real Estate Crowdfunding

2015-06-24-1435182623-9622836-SohinShah.pngAuthor Sohin Shah successfully crowdfunded Valuation App from 57 backers in 2012 and went on to start iFunding, which is now one of the leading real estate crowdfunding platforms in the world. 

The American public’s trust in big banks is nearing all-time lows. An increasing number of investors are tired of receiving zero to negligible net returns from their local banks. As a result, a higher percentage of investors are seeking new avenues for efficient and transparent investing.

Over the past three years, the real estate industry has been at the forefront of creating one of those new avenues – crowdfunding platforms. To give you a sense of its growth, the total combined investment funds for real estate crowdfunding platforms increased from $2.7 billion in 2012 to $5.1 billion in 2013. 2014 was on pace to exceed well over $10 billion.

It’s a lucrative choice. The combined value of real estate here in the U.S. is larger than the combined bond and stock markets. Back in July 2012, the U.S. bond market was valued close to $37 trillion while the U.S. stock market was closer to $21 trillion. Yet, real estate is the largest and most valuable asset class of them all. Per a December 2014 report from the Federal Reserve, real estate continues to be the largest combined asset class worth an estimated $40 trillion. Residential real estate accounts for almost 60 percent while the commercial real estate sector represents closer to 40 percent of this total number.

The following offers insight into the state of the real estate market today and how crowdfunding platforms are proving it to be a viable investment in 2015 and beyond.

The JOBS Act and Crowdfunding

In 2012, Congress passed the JOBS Act, whose original intent was to encourage and provide efficient funding options for small businesses partly by easing securities regulations. Following this event, real estate crowdfunding received mainstream attention in 2013 when many of the current industry-leading platforms such as iFunding (my company), Fundrise, Realty Mogul and Patch of Land went live with their websites. These help to eliminate the “middleman” (aka banks and hard money lenders), and share higher profits and returns directly with investors.

What makes crowdfunding so appealing is that investors have the opportunity to invest in bigger, institutional quality properties with relatively smaller amounts of capital. Another added benefit is that they don’t need to deal directly with any potential problems associated with the tenants or the buildings, thus making it a form of passive investment.

For Investors, the Value Is Clear

Crowdfunding platforms allow investors to analyze and clearly understand the opportunities for investments at the touch of their keyboard or mobile device just like with the stock market. It has introduced technology and transparency to real estate, an industry that was long overdue for disruption. As such, the more efficient use of technology is lowering the cost of capital and overhead operators, which, in turn, allows the crowdfunding platforms to share a higher percentage of their profits with their investors.

Other value-added opportunities include:

  • Pre-vetted investment opportunities that allow individuals with no prior real estate-investing experience to participate in deals.
  • Transparent reporting that allows users to stay updated on all of their investments.
  • Diversification options that offer risk mitigation.
  • Analytics to guide informed investment decisions.
  • Digital payments to eliminate the need to send paper checks or go to the bank to transfer funds.

Derivative Businesses Represent a Huge Opportunity for EntrepreneursThe growth of real estate crowdfunding has been a gold rush for entrepreneurs. Many have started businesses that seek to build a surrounding ecosystem, supporting real estate crowdfunding platforms in their efforts of staying compliant and bringing efficiency to the overall business. In particular, the following have emerged at the forefront as extremely important platforms that allow sites like that of my company, iFunding, to scale.

  • FundAmerica: Since going live with their API in November 2014, FundAmerica has emerged as a leader in providing “FinTech” services such as online escrows, state securities dealer clearance, background checks and payment processing.
  • Accredify: This startup provides tax transcripts via the IRS 4506-T form to determine if investors qualify as “Accredited” Investors. They make asset verification easy using simple online bank and 4506-T forms to allow them to approve an individual’s income from the IRS directly.
  • LendIt: As the leading organizer of conferences for the global online lending community, LendIt introduces global P2P (“Peer to Peer”) market leaders. Three of LendIt’s most popular and informative regional conferences are located in the USA, Europe, and China each year.

The Future

Securities regulations may get more streamlined and efficient in 2015 in both individual states by way of automated federal regulations that are easier to understand for both investors and business owners seeking to raise new capital. If so, more successful and profitable crowdfunding platforms may lead to more jobs, higher profits for investors and increased tax revenues for the states and federal government.

As time evolves, we may see synergic deals where multiple crowdfunding platforms may be working on the same deal, providing both debt and equity while many of the local banks sit on the sidelines wondering why they are not as speedy, efficient, and affordable as real estate crowdfunding platforms.

As a result, I believe banks may soon be losing customers who are tired of earning zero to negative net returns with bank savings accounts — and these real estate investment opportunities and solutions will be more accessible and profitable than ever.

BRIEF-Beijing Dalong Weiye Real Estate's chairman Li Shaolin retires

Beijing Dalong Weiye Real Estate
Development Co Ltd

* Says chairman Li Shaolin resigns as he has reached
retirement age

Source text in Chinese:

Further company coverage:

(Reporting By Hong Kong newsroom)

Real estate agent charged with taking items from unoccupied home

A 44-year-old Wilton Manors real estate agent has been charged with burglary and grand theft in connection with items stolen from the backyard of an house listed for sale, police said.

Joseph Schutz, an agent with Re/Max, is accused with taking the property from an unoccupied Wilton Manors home on June 14.

Police said a neighbor noticed a vehicle parked at the residence and called the owner to confirm that no one was authorized to be there. When police responded, the vehicle was gone, as was unspecified property from the back yard.

“Schutz was interviewed by investigators and property from this burglary was recovered at his residence,” police said in a press release. “Schutz admitted to taking the items from the victim’s backyard after finding the residence listed for sale.”

He was arrested Wednesday.

In first appearance court Thursday afternoon, Broward Judge John “Jay” Hurley questioned Schutz about his time in the community and his licensing as a real estate agent.

Hurley said he would release Schutz without bond “since it involved Mr. Schutz and he seems like a pretty nice guy.”

Copyright © 2015, Sun Sentinel

East Greenwich home sells for $555K | South Jersey real estate



— 46 Pleasant Hill Road, Phillip Yurgin to Robert W. DeVault Jr. for $302,000.


— 239 Green Ave., Theophilus Pitter to Mikhail Borshchik for $18,000.

— 4 Suncrest Ave., Fannie Mae to Felix A. Figueroa for $30,900.

— 10 Hopewell Road, Karen Bailey to Harry Gandy IV for $45,000.


— 121 6th Ave., Kimberly R. Fields to John Bibeau for $15,000.

— 312 Justice Dr., Gregory C. and Bonnie L. Merilli to Matthew V. Phillips for $140,000.


— 226 Palm Road, Gregory Rock to Johnson Valley Investments LLC for $2,000.

— 7501 and 7507 Battle Lane, Parish of the Holy Cross to the Township of Commercial for $10,000.

— 8012 Henry St., Jesse E. Seymour Sr. to Victoria Weber for $32,000.


— 18 Pindale Dr., Patricia A. Dobbins to Mark A. Schenberger for $135,000.


— 213 Tall Pines Dr., Lynda Patterson to Tiburcio A. Torres III for $285,000.

— 1033 Sussex Ave., Paul S. Grande and Michelle Mulligan to Shaun M. Spears for $131,000.

— 112 Red Tail Hawk Circle, Nova Properties of New Jersey LLC to NVR Inc. for $85,694.


— 110 Acorn Dr., Brad W. and Karen L. Slavinski to Barbara Jean and Nicholas Fountoulakis for $230,000.

— 500 Legends Court, Phillip Yurgin to Allen Baker and Sheri Rabanal for $555,000.


— 21 Mill Road, William P. Seher to Multani Real Estate LLC for $40,000.

— 611 Mullica Hill Road, C. Evans Neale to Lee M. Fox for $95,000,


— 114 Grandview Dr., Lanpro LLC to Bruce Simpson Jr. for $175,000.


— 272 Shaws Mill Road, Nicholas A. DiJoseph to Ronald Tobolski for $170,000.


— 178 Maskells Mill Road, Alan B. and Anne M. Parmelee to John Kelly for $332,000.


— 586 Haines Neck Road, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation to John J. Moore Jr., for $40,000.


— 46 Meadow Court, Melissa Cavuto to Stephen and Susan Tymchy for $170,000.


— 1310 Galloway Court, George F. and Lorrie L. Hutchinson to Thomas Accoglio for $249,000.


— 500 Crozier Ave., Shirley Williams to Mark Kaszyk and Susannah Mallon for $155,500.


— 231 Cedar Ave., Fannie Mae to David and Mary Reinherz for $37,700.


— 54 E. Griffith St., Provident Funding Association LP to Carmen D. Serrano for $20,000.


— 128 to 130 N. Broadway, Peter Parizzi Jr. and Patricia Ruth Hoisington to 130 N. Broadway Pennsville NJ LLC for $275,000.


— 311 Olivet Road, J.E. Waterhouse LLC to Ryan D. and Denise M. Madden for $301,500.

— Crow Pond Road, Davis M. and Lucinda R. Adams to Robert Rone for $301,000.


— 224 Finley Road, James L. Turner to John J. Newton III for $249,900.

— 4 Johns Way, National Residential Nominee Services Inc. to Katelyn L. Bayzick for $232,000.


— 2507 W. Weymouth Road, Frederick S. Lavalle to Mark McCaslin for $325,000.

— 2139 E. Chestnut Ave., Roseann Hewitt to Patricia Barile for $97,000.

— 1367 Nelson Ave., George Fulton to Christina M. Rossi for $100,000.

— 1460 N. Maple Dr., Deborah DeShields to Desiree Quinones for $126,500.

— 2585 London Lane, Hogback Group LLC to Sherwood Forest Homes LLC for $61,000.

— 2602 London Lane, Hogback Group LLC to Sherwood Forest Homes LLC for $61,000.


— 2 Gabloubet Walk, Thomas M. and Patricia A. Hutchinson to Andrew J. and Kylie Gillespie for $265,000.

— 248 Champion Way, Stephen C. and Kristen S. Smickley to Nicholas Palmisano for $232,500.


— 3 W. Buttonwood Dr., Marion H. Allen to Lauren B. Leer for $205,000.

— 103 N. Synnott Ave., Sara D. Crane to Michael R. and Genevieve A. Pawela for $338,750.


— 93 Ginger Ave., Anthony and Dawn H. Dameika to Steven E. Delaney for $152,000.

— 675 Frances Ave., Christopher D. and Dale Nichols to Patricia Ann Nichols for $109,000.


— 229 Wilson Ave., Kelly Dunne to Phillip P. Dunne Jr. for $147,023.50.


— 15 Lamplighter Dr., Pamela M. Smith to Frederick M. and Kerry C. Heathwaite for $310,000.


— 13 Buckeye Road, Seth R. and Elizabeth A. Kaelin to Stephan R. Thomas Jr. for $300,000.

— 225 Rainey Road, Jay S. Chinski and Jennifer Janof to Michael A. and Kristine A. Perro for $285,000.